Boundaries, Overcommitment, and the Regulatory Yes

Why You Agree to Things You Don't Want to Agree To

A common experience: someone asks you for something. To take on work, to adjust a deadline, to accommodate a request that inconveniences you. In the moment, you say yes.

Later (sometimes immediately after), you realize you did not want to say yes. The commitment now exists. You are stuck with it.

This is not simply "people-pleasing" in the casual sense. It reflects specific cognitive dynamics related to impulsivity, social threat processing, and real-time decision-making under constraint.

---

The Impulsive "Yes"

ADHD includes impulsivity as a core feature. Impulsivity is not just about physical actions. It is about responses. The brain generates a response before the evaluative systems can complete their assessment.

The sequence:

1. Request arrives
2. Emotional reaction activates (desire to please, fear of rejection, interest in novel project)
3. Impulsivity bypasses deliberation
4. "Yes" exits mouth
5. Regret follows when reality sets in

This happens in seconds, faster than boundary intentions can be retrieved from memory.

Strong evidence: Response inhibition (the ability to suppress prepotent responses) is impaired in ADHD. This directly affects the capacity to pause and evaluate before responding in social situations.

---

Working Memory Failure Under Social Pressure

You may have boundary scripts. You may know exactly what you want to say in hypothetical terms. Under social pressure, these scripts become functionally inaccessible.

Boundary intentions exist in memory but cannot be retrieved when needed. Stress depletes working memory capacity. ADHD brains have lower baseline capacity to begin with. Under pressure, default responses (compliance, agreement, accommodation) take over.

This is why scripts fail. The barrier is not knowing what to say. It is the neurobiological cost of saying it in the moment.

---

"Saying Yes" as Emotional Regulation

Agreeing to a request provides immediate relief from uncomfortable emotions:

• The discomfort of disappointing someone
• The fear of conflict
• The anxiety of potential rejection

"Yes" drops the physiological stress spike fast. Heart rate eases. Intrusive thoughts quiet. The brain has achieved immediate emotional regulation.

This is short-term regulation that ignores long-term capacity. When the stress spike subsides, you are left with a commitment you cannot fulfill, which will create more stress later.

---

The Social Debt Psychology

Many adults with ADHD carry a sense of accumulated social debt from past transgressions: lateness, forgetfulness, incomplete follow-through.

Saying "yes" to requests becomes opportunity to "pay down" this perceived debt. If I do this for them, maybe it compensates for all the times I've let people down.

This psychology transforms each new request into a referendum on past failures. Saying "no" is not just declining this request. It is refusing to make amends, which intensifies guilt.

---

Why Boundaries Feel Dangerous

Standard boundary advice assumes the barrier is skill: you need to learn the right words, the right framing, the right assertiveness techniques.

For ADHD, the barrier is often the emotional experience of boundary-setting itself:

RSD activation. Saying "no" might upset the other person. The anticipation of their disappointment triggers threat-response systems. "Yes" becomes the escape route from potential rejection.

Conflict avoidance as survival. Many ADHD adults developed conflict avoidance as a coping mechanism after years of receiving criticism. Avoiding conflict through compliance becomes automatic, a survival pattern operating below conscious choice.

Guilt amplification. Emotional dysregulation makes post-"no" guilt physiologically intolerable. The boundary script does not address the emotional aftermath.

---

Why Scripts Fail in the Moment

Boundary scripts look perfect on paper:

• "I'm not available for meetings after 5pm."
• "I need 24 hours to respond to non-urgent requests."
• "I can't take on additional projects right now."

In the moment:

Working memory failures. Under duress, recalling the rehearsed response fails. The script exists but cannot be accessed in time.

Emotional flooding. Strong emotions override prefrontal planning. The limbic system responds before the script can be retrieved.

Habit patterns. Years of impulsive agreement have created neural pathways. New patterns require repeated practice to compete.

The frustrating result: you know what to say (knowledge exists) but cannot say it when it matters (performance fails).

---

The Aftermath Pattern

Boundary collapse follows a recognizable sequence:

1. You agree to something in the moment
2. You recognize (shortly after) that you did not want to agree
3. You feel resentment: at yourself, at the other person, at the situation
4. You may attempt to renegotiate, or you may absorb the commitment
5. The next request arrives, and the pattern repeats

Over time, this creates a professional life shaped by other people's requests rather than your own priorities. Resentment accumulates. Burnout risk increases. The boundaries you would have set in theory do not exist in practice.

---

What This Means

If you consistently agree to things you do not want to agree to, this is not because you lack self-knowledge or assertiveness skills. It reflects the timing mismatch between social demands and cognitive processing, compounded by impulsivity and threat-avoidance patterns.

The problem is architectural, not characterological. Your response system fires before your evaluation system completes. Understanding this changes the interpretation from I'm weak or I have no backbone to my response system operates faster than my deliberation system.